This article is
here only because others like you -- unionists who understand the importance
of democracy in our unions and our countries -- contribute to AUD.
From the January-February
2007 issue of Union Democracy Review #166
In Food Workers Local 951
Pressuring witnesses to save a suspect election
By Judith Schneider
In September 2005, the U.S. Department of Labor filed
suit to overturn August-September 2004 mail ballot results and order new
elections for president and three regional vice-presidents of Local 951,
United Food and Commercial Workers. With some 33,000 members throughout
Michigan, the local is one of the largest in the UFCW. The union's next
regular election is scheduled for Summer - Fall 2007 and the lawsuit is
still pending.
In the challenged election Russell Blunden, a relative
newcomer to local union politics, had gotten 45% (3,420) of the vote to
24 year incumbent president Bob Potter's 55% (4,181). Turnout was reported
to have been the highest in local history. The DOL charged substantial
and numerous LMRDA violations, including: no secret balloting; ballot
distribution and collection by staff at work sites; failure to account
for hundreds of unused ballots and replacement ballots; denying ballots
to eligible voters; discriminating in the use of the membership list;
and using union and employer money to promote the incumbent slate. If
the DOL is right, Blunden's recorded 45%, in overcoming such obstacles,
was astounding.
Incumbent President Potter resigned on July 1, 2006.
Some months later the executive board appointed Marv Russo, a prominent
member of the international's official family, to fill Potter's remaining
term. Naturally, there is widespread speculation that he will run in the
upcoming election. As in many other unions, there is a union 'tradition'
of midterm retirements to open the way for candidates acceptable to the
international to run as incumbents.
The local is vigorously contesting the suit. One intimidating
effort is a massive campaign to contain damage from disclosures to the
DOL: A letter during the investigation gave "guidance" to all
members, informing them that providing a false written or oral report,
even one that "you believe was correct... can be a felony."
It advised them that they had the right to refuse to talk to the DOL and
to have a union attorney present if they did so. Later, President Potter
contacted all members believed to have provided information to the Labor
Department, presented them with a form letter to enable them to obtain
a copy of their statements and enclosed a stamped envelope to mail the
statement to the union's attorney. There was no "guidance" in
that letter that members had a right to refuse to do so.
The DOL case against local 951 was initially scheduled
to go to trial on April 9, 2007, but has been moved to June 4.
This website
is made possible by contributions from union members and supporters like
you. Please help us build the movement for union democracy, join
or contribute to AUD.
Use
the following credit line on the materials you use: "From the
website of the Association for Union Democracy. www.uniondemocracy.org. Email:
info@uniondemocracy.org. 104 Montgomery Street, Brooklyn, New York, 11225; USA;
718-564-1114"